logo logo European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education

EJMSE is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.


Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
authentic assessment conventional assessments instructional leadership investigative mathematics science learning

Authentic Assessment for Motivating Student Learning and Teaching Effectiveness in Rural, High-Need Secondary Schools in Manitoba, Canada

Eric K. Appiah-Odame

This paper derives from a large research project focusing on mathematics and science assessment of student learning in three high-need, rural, and urb.


This paper derives from a large research project focusing on mathematics and science assessment of student learning in three high-need, rural, and urban secondary schools in Manitoba, Canada. The study employed qualitative methods of semi-structured interviews and classroom video recordings of teaching practice experiences of 12 mathematics and science teachers, with the purpose that explore how authentic assessment forms assist effective teaching to monitor and motivate student learning achievement and growth. The results indicate that about 67% (eight out of the twelve of the participants) of the research participants practice the traditional mode of standard assessment that consists of multiple forms of questioning. The participants' rationale relates to speedy evaluations of student work, preparing feedback reports to parents and students, and objectivity of the assessment process. The other 33% (four out of twelve of the participants) of participants practice authentic assessment that concentrates on: (1) Allowing students to apply what they have learned rather than testing their ability to memorize and regurgitate concepts, (2) Allowing students to personalize their knowledge and values, (3) Encouraging group project-based learning and with the use of rubric for evaluating and monitoring, (4) Promoting deep learning to become life-long learners, (5) Recognizing, acknowledging, and validating diversity in student learning styles, interests, and aspirations, and further, authentic assessment is an excellent opportunity to apply communicative technologies such as podcasts and webinars in learning and undertaking investigations in mathematics and science learning. Furthermore, some participants asserted that authentic assessments are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and resource-demanding, aside from the limited resources and lack of training, which are some of the challenges of implementing authentic assessment. Other participants stated that all teachers must be familiar with using all assessment tools. The paper concludes that the principal plays a critical instructional leadership role in a school-wide implementation of authentic assessment.

Keywords: Authentic assessment, conventional assessments, instructional leadership, investigative mathematics, science learning.

cloud_download PDF
Article Metrics


Aksu Ataç, B. (2012). Foreign language teachers’ attitude toward authentic assessment in language teaching. The Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 8(2), 7-19. https://www.jlls.org/vol8no2/7-19.pdf

Bailey, J. (2014). Mathematical investigations for supporting pre-service primary teachers repeating a mathematics education course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n2.8 

Begley, P. (2010). Leading with moral purpose: The place of ethics. In T. Bush, L. Bell & D. Middleworth (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management (2nd ed., pp. 31-54). Sage Publications.

Brolund, L. (2016). Student success through instructional leadership. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 8(2), 42-45. https://bit.ly/4aBTnLM

Brown, G. T. L. (2022). The past, present and future of educational assessment: A transdisciplinary perspective. Frontier Education, 7, Article 1060633. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1060633 

Callison, D. (1998). Authentic assessment. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 14(5), 42-43.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Commission on K-12 Education. (2020). Our children success: Manitoba’s future (Report of the commission on K to12 education). https://bit.ly/4bMYUA5

Goos, M., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2007). Supporting an investigative approach to teaching secondary school mathematics: A professional development model. In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 325-334). Merga Inc.

Grant, K., Fedoruk, L., & Nowell, L. (2021). Conversations and reflections on authentic assessment. Imagining SoTL, 1, 146-162. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl532

Hatteburg, K. L. (2014). Building investigative skills and critical thinking for middle school students through inquiry-based science lessons [Master’s thesis, California State University]. Digital Commons @ SCUMB. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes/404  

Hume, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319661

Kajitani, S., Morimoto, K., & Suzuki, S. (2020). Information feedback in relative grading: Evidence from a field experiment. PLoS ONE, 15(4), Article e0231548. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231548

Kerka, S. (1995). Techniques for authentic assessment, practice application (ED381688). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED381688

Kibble, J. D. (2017). Best practices in summative assessment. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00116.2016

Koh, K. H. (2017). Authentic assessment. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.22

Larmer, J. (2012, June 5). PBL: What does it take for a project to be ‘authentic’? Edutopia. https://edut.to/3ys7TZ5

Magoma, M. C. (2016). The shift and emphasis toward curriculum integration: Meaning and rationale. African Educational Research Journal, 4(2), 25-30. https://www.netjournals.org/z_AERJ_16_017.html

Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning. Manitoba. https://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/assess/wncp/full_doc.pdf    

Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: Enhancing student learning through online faculty development. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1). https://jolt.merlot.org/vol1_no1_mueller.htm  

Ngozwana, N. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research methodology: Researcher's reflections. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.1.19

Nguyen, T. T. H., & Walker, M. (2016). Sustainable assessment for lifelong learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.985632

Nivera, G. C. (2017). What happened when teachers and students are introduced to mathematical investigations: An exploratory study. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 8(3), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.4256/ijmtl.v18i3.90

Obilor, E. I. (2023). Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the same? International Journal of Innovative Social and Science Educational Research, 11(1), 1-7. https://bit.ly/3wU0BNg

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238-254. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol12/iss2/7/

Quansah, F. (2018). Traditional or performance assessment: What is the right way in assessing learners? Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 21-24. https://bit.ly/3Vj1oRo

Shane, S. (2021, September 24). How to set up authentic assessments in high school English. Edutopia. https://edut.to/3yizX0L

Sofaer, D. (1999). Qualitative methods: What are they and why use them? Health Services Research, 34(5), 1101-1118.

Tilley, S. (2019). The role of critical qualitative research in educational context: A Canadian perspective. Educar em Revista, Curitiba, Brasil, 35(75), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.66806

Torulf, P. (2008a). Impact of authenticity of sense making in word problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9083-3

Torulf, P. (2008b). Performance assessment and authentic assessment: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 13(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7275/0qpc-ws45 

Villarreal, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(5), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Zwaagstra, M. (2022). The decline of standardized testing in Canada. Fraser Institute. https://bit.ly/3V1oZol