logo logo European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education

EJMSE is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
analogies magic tricks science instruction

Use of Magic Tricks as Analogies in the Science Classroom

Danny Rudnick , Sarah B. Boesdorfer

Science, magic, and education have always been linked, from science-based magic shows to teachers presenting demonstrations as magic tricks to capture.

S

Science, magic, and education have always been linked, from science-based magic shows to teachers presenting demonstrations as magic tricks to capture their students’ interest and provide a mnemonic reference for the topics under discussion. Magic as an art form is also often used to convey information or act as an analogy for invisible phenomena. This study examined how the use of a magic effect designed as an analogy for active and passive transport in cells affected student scores and perception of the activity when compared to a standard story analogy in a high school integrated science course. To determine this, students participated in either a magic-based analogy activity (MBAA) or a concrete story-based analogy activity (SBAA), and then data was collected and analysed using a pre-test/post-test for the content and a Likert-scale anonymous survey for the student perception of the activity. The MBAA was shown to be similar to the SBAA in helping students learn but had the added benefit of increasing students’ reported engagement with the activity. This study shows how bringing magic into the science classroom can have a positive impact on student engagement and provides teachers with another option to support student learning.

Keywords: Analogies, magic tricks, science instruction

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
36
Download
125
Citations
Crossref
0

References

Aragón, M. d. M., Oliva, J. M., & Navarrete, A. (2014). Contributions of learning through analogies to the construction of secondary education pupils’ verbal discourse about chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1960-1984. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.887237

Broome, S. A. (1995). Magic in the classroom. Beyond Behavior, 6(2), 23-26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44707128

Brown, S., & Salter, S. (2010). Analogies in science and science teaching. Advances in Physiology Education, 34(4), 167-169. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00022.2010

de Winter, J. F. C., & Dodou, D. (2019). Five-point likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Addendum added October 2012). Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation15(11), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7275/BJ1P-TS64

Domínguez, X. R. (2020). Teaching with magic: A hands-on manual for teachers, parents, and magicians (A. Stojilkov, Trans.). Páginas Libros de Magia. (Original work published 2013)

Duthie-Fox, C. (1999). The magic of science. Science Scope, 22(6), 58-60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43179802

Fenster, A. E., Harpp, D. N., & Schwarcz, J. A. (1985). Chemistry for the public: “The magic of chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education, 62(12), 1100-1101. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed062p1100

Fisher, K. M., Williams, K. S., & Lineback, J. E. (2011). Osmosis and diffusion conceptual assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education10(4), 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-04-0038

Glynn, S. M. (2012). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. M. Glynn, B. K. Britton, & R. H. Yeany (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219-240). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052396

GonzálezEspada, W. J., Birriel, J., & Birriel, I. (2010). Discrepant events: A challenge to students’ intuition. The Physics Teacher, 48(8), 508-511. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3502499

Ham, H. (2021). How teachers can use their hobbies to boost student engagement. Edutopia. https://bit.ly/3Xik6cX

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301010

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies: Friend or foe? In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (pp. 11-24). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_2

Hepburn, J., & Jacobsen, E. K. (2010). The magic of good chemistry: An interview with Jeffrey Hepburn, 2010 Conant Award winner. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(9), 912-915. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100651u

Hoover, T. (2016). Teaching discrepant events with the 5E instructional model. Science Scope, 40(1), 14-16.

Jonāne, L. (2015). Analogies in science education. Pedagogika, 119(3), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2015.027

Kett, M. (2002). Houdini in the classroom. Xlibris Corp.

Lancor, R. A. (2014). Using student-generated analogies to investigate conceptions of energy: A multidisciplinary study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.714512

Landman, T. (2018). Academic magic: Performance and the communication of fundamental ideas. Journal of Performance Magic, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5920/jpm.2018.02

Lang, M. (n.d.). Quiz 5—Active and passive transport. Quia.  https://www.quia.com/quiz/2597999.html

Lin, J.-L., Cheng, M.-F., Chang, Y.-C., Li, H.-W., Chang, J.-Y., & Lin, D.-M. (2014). Learning activities that combine science magic activities with the 5E instructional model to influence secondary-school students’ attitudes to science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education10(5), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1103a

Lin, J.-L., Cheng, M.-F., Lin, S.-Y., Chang, J.-Y., Chang, Y.-C., Li, H.-W., & Lin, D.-M. (2017). The effects of combining inquiry-based teaching with science magic on the learning outcomes of a friction unit. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.218

Madden, L., Seifried, J., Farnum, K., & D’Armiento, A. (2016). When discrepant events change the plans: An unexpected investigation of physical properties and reactions. Science Activities, 53(2), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2016.1156629

National Association of Independent Schools. (2020). Facts at a glance 2020-2021. https://bit.ly/3RR5fTw

Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026

Rudnick, D. (2021, September 8). "CAPT" card trick [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHb8pRTdTpM

Sagan, C., & Druyan, A. (1997). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark (Reprinted ed.). Ballantine Books.

Sahidu, H., Susilawati, Zuhdi, M., & Rokhmat, J. (2021). Student score and responses to the analogy approach in learning physics in terms of gender and parents’ work. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1816, Article 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012070

Scott, D. M. (1980). The popular lecture and the creation of a public in mid-nineteenth-century America. The Journal of American History, 66(4), 791-809. https://doi.org/10.2307/1887637

Seiler, K. P., & Huggins, J. (2018). From cheese curls to fatty acid structure: Using “commonplace” analogies to teach science to nonmajors. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(2), 393-395. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00180.2017

Shana, Z. A., & Shareef, M. A. E. (2022). Science teachers’ use of analogies: Findings from classroom practices. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1023-1036. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1023

Suwono, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R., Kusairi, S., Saefi, M., Fuzzi, A., & Atho’Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell Biology Diagnostic Test (CBD-Test) portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of Biological Education55(1), 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1643765

Taufiq, M., Suhandi, A., & Liliawati, W. (2017). Effect of science magic applied in interactive lecture demonstrations on conceptual understanding. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), Article 070007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995183

Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Joslin, P., & Lindauer, I. (1992). Science teachers’ use of analogies: Observations from classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140404

Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., & Venville, G. J. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180206

Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., & Venville, G. J. (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogies: An approach for Ppreservice and inservice Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009423030880

Trout, L. (Ed.). (2012). POGIL activities for high school biology. Flinn Scientific.

Tsai, C.-C. (1999). Overcoming junior high school students’ misconceptions about microscopic views of phase change: A study of an analogy activity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009485722628

Walton, K. L. W. (2023). Use of a short, in-class drawing activity to assess student understanding of core concepts of the cell membrane in an undergraduate physiology course. Advances in Physiology Education47(3), 508-513. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00218.2022

Weaver, G. (2008). Teaching to achieve conceptual change. In N. J. Pienta, M. M. Cooper, & T. J. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemists’ guide to effective teaching (pp. 35-48). Pearson Prentice Hall.

West, A. E. (2014). “Tricks” work! The Mathematics Teacher, 107(6), 408-409. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.6.0408

Wiseman, R., Houstoun, W., & Watt, C. (2020). Pedagogic prestidigitation: Using magic tricks to enhance educational videos. PeerJ, 8, Article e9610. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9610

Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2020). Conjuring cognition: A review of educational magic-based interventions. PeerJ, 8, Article, e8747. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8747

Wiseman, R., Wiles, A., & Watt, C. (2021). Conjuring up creativity: The effect of performing magic tricks on divergent thinking. PeerJ, 9, Article e11289. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11289

 

...