In the domain of engineering education, the crucial role of mathematics, especially Calculus, cannot be overstated, as it lays the foundational groundwork for numerous sciences, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) courses. The integration of mathematics into STEM disciplines is achieved through the practical application of mathematical concepts in real-world scenarios or in conjunction with other STEM subjects, thereby enhancing the coherence of engineering studies and acting as a significant motivational catalyst for students. This paper presents an analytical narrative of a practical mathematics assignment, woven into the Calculus curriculum and other STEM courses from 2013 to 2018. It delves into the potential impacts of these practical assignments on student performance and attitudes by evaluating data sourced from final exam scores and anonymous course surveys, both before and after the intervention period. Through the analysis of an extensive dataset comprising 1526 final exam scores, this study endeavors to make a substantive contribution to Future Technology Studies (FTS), focusing on the strategic harmonization of mathematics and STEM courses to enrich the educational experience and foster a more cohesive and applied learning framework in these disciplines.

Research shows that learning enjoyment in specific socio-scientific issues (SSI) plays an important role in predicting grade 10 students’ learning interest and learning enjoyment (i.e., genuine interest) in SSI subjects generally. However, it remains unexplored whether learning enjoyment also mediates a predictive effect of learning interest in a Big Science SSI of pressing contemporary global concern—COVID-19—on grade 12 high school students’ learning interest in SSI generally. The purpose of this study is to investigate how learning enjoyment may mediate the predictive effect of learning interest in the specific Big Science SSI of COVID-19 specifically on students’ learning interest in SSI subjects generally. Latent variable modeling using data collected from grade 12 students (N = 691) showed personal perceptions of learning enjoyment in SSI partially mediated the predictive effect of learning interest in the SSI of COVID-19 on learning interest in other Big Science SSI subjects. Implications for promoting among science educators and policy specialists the active development of students’ individual interests and involvement in other 21st century Big Science SSI challenges are forwarded. 

Scaffolding dialogue is a concept in learning that refers to the support or assistance given to individuals during the dialogue process. The main objective of this research is to create a basic structure of dialogue to help and support students during the learning process in improving their algebraic reasoning skills. Algebraic reasoning is a process in which students generalize mathematical ideas from a certain set of examples, establish these generalizations through argumentative discourse, and express them in a formal and age-appropriate way. The study was designed using the grounded theory qualitative model method, which used three sequential steps: open coding, selective coding, and theoretical coding. The research was conducted on students of the mathematics education department at Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Data collection methods include algebraic reasoning ability tests, questionnaires, and interviews. Data analysis in grounded theory is an iterative and non-linear process that requires researchers to constantly move back and forth between data collection and analysis. This process aims to produce a theory that is valid and can explain phenomena well based on empirical data obtained during research. The dialogue scaffolding strategy framework in improving students' algebraic reasoning abilities includes instructing, locating, identifying, modeling, advocating, exploring, reformulating, challenging, and evaluating.

Global concern surrounds students' mathematics learning, development, and achievement. Scholarly discussions have explored various factors influencing students' mathematics performance. However, more information is needed to understand the impact of mathematics teaching styles on student outcomes in developing contexts like Nepal. This study examines the moderators of mathematics teaching styles and their influence on students' performance. To achieve this, the Teachers' Teaching Style Questionnaire (TTSQ) collected quantitative data from 469 grade nine students across 14 high schools in Kathmandu, Lalitpur, and Bhaktapur districts of Nepal. Confirmatory factor analysis, path analysis, and moderation analysis were performed to examine the effects of teaching styles on student achievement in mathematics. Key findings indicate that teaching styles, such as consideration and openness, are not significant predictors of student achievement, but rigid teaching styles can predict student achievement in mathematics. However, impact of the rigid teaching style was negative on student achievement. School type influenced the relationship between performance and considerate teaching, favoring private schools. School location influenced the relationship between considerate teaching and student performance in mathematics, favoring rural schools. Likewise, urban schools had a negative effect on the relationship between teacher openness and student performance, but rural schools had a positive effect on their relationship. Furthermore, low and high-ability students moderated the relationship between considerate teaching and student achievement, with the negative effect of low ability on considerate teaching and student performance and the positive influence of high ability on considerate teaching and student achievement. Student ability influenced the relationship between teacher openness and student performance, with a negative moderations of low and moderate ability students. The study concludes by emphasizing the importance of teacher training in teaching styles for high schools in Nepal and similar contexts.

This study investigates an integrative instructional model combining Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA), Task Analysis (TA), and the 3R strategies (relaxation, repetition, and routine) in teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities (LD). LD is a neurological disorder that affects the capacity to acquire skills in reading, writing, and mathematics, presenting persistent challenges that traditional teaching approaches may not fully address. Through an ethnographic approach involving participatory observation of a teacher and three LD students over a semester, this study examines how the CPA model—progressing from concrete objects to pictorial aids and then to abstract concepts—can be customised to individual needs. Findings highlight that CPA is most effective when adapted to the diverse learning styles of LD students. While one student thrives with tactile tools to reinforce understanding, another becomes distracted, viewing the concrete aids as play items, and a third displays a preference for abstract reasoning without needing pictorial or tangible support. The TA framework, used to deconstruct complex tasks, enables students to engage in incremental learning steps, while the 3R approach helps foster a supportive learning environment by incorporating relaxation, routine, and reinforcement of concepts. By accommodating individual learning preferences, teachers can support diverse cognitive processes and promote meaningful progress in mathematical understanding. The study calls for educators to move beyond conventional one-size-fits-all strategies, advocating for personalised and adaptive approaches that can better meet the unique needs of LD students in mathematics education.

Comparison of mathematics textbooks between Indonesia and Singapore is one way to assess the educational process. This article provides insight into how mathematical concepts are taught and applied in problem-solving in each country. The study provides knowledge about how mathematical concepts are constructed by teachers and students and implemented in problem-solving between countries. This study aims to compare task designs in high school mathematics textbooks between Indonesia and Singapore based on the type of task, technique, technology, and theory used, with a focus on cubes and cuboids. The comparative analysis of the two books uses praxeological theory, the main construction of Didactic Anthropology Theory, with reference to epistemological model (REM) model analysis. The research results show that there are differences in the approaches, methods, and habits used in task design in the two countries. The techniques, technology and theories found in the two task designs show that Indonesian mathematics textbooks use more verification and drawing up conclusions which are influenced by perceptual techniques. Meanwhile, the task of designing Singapore's mathematics textbooks involves more direct investigations into forming students' knowledge through physical and operational techniques. The techniques, technology, and theories used in both designs influence the number of learning obstacles. Epistemological constraints occur in Indonesian textbooks and only a few in Singapore textbooks. These findings provide insight into how to build mathematical knowledge for students through good assignment design based on a country's educational character.

This study explores how mentor teachers in specialized teaching areas, particularly chemistry, interact in an Online Professional Development (OPD) program. The Mentor Teacher Professional Development (MeT-PD) program was designed to improve mentoring practices by creating opportunities for collaborative learning through various online activities, such as Individual Response (IR), Interactive Individual Response (IIR), Small Group Discussions (SGD), and Large Group Discussions (LGD). Using a qualitative case study approach, the research analyzed data collected from Zoom recordings and Nearpod activity logs. The findings indicate that while LGDs were useful for interactions between facilitators and learners, they were not as effective in fostering interaction among learners themselves, mainly due to the cognitive demands and how these discussions were structured. On the other hand, SGDs seemed to foster stronger participant interaction, probably because the smaller group settings led to more valuable exchanges. These findings highlight the need of thoughtful planning of OPD activities, with particular focus on group size management and selection of suitable discussion formats to improve both interaction and learning outcomes.