logo logo European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education

EJMSE is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

RHAPSODE
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
RHAPSODE
Headquarters
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
Research Article

Evaluating the Efficacy of an Integrative Instructional Framework in Mathematics Education for Students

Thanyaluck Ingkavara , Pratchayapong Yasri

This study investigates an integrative instructional model combining Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA), Task Analysis (TA), and the 3R strategies (rel.


  • Pub. date: March 15, 2025
  • Online Pub. date: March 12, 2025
  • Pages: 51-64
  • 21 Downloads
  • 54 Views
  • 0 Citations

T

This study investigates an integrative instructional model combining Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA), Task Analysis (TA), and the 3R strategies (relaxation, repetition, and routine) in teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities (LD). LD is a neurological disorder that affects the capacity to acquire skills in reading, writing, and mathematics, presenting persistent challenges that traditional teaching approaches may not fully address. Through an ethnographic approach involving participatory observation of a teacher and three LD students over a semester, this study examines how the CPA model—progressing from concrete objects to pictorial aids and then to abstract concepts—can be customised to individual needs. Findings highlight that CPA is most effective when adapted to the diverse learning styles of LD students. While one student thrives with tactile tools to reinforce understanding, another becomes distracted, viewing the concrete aids as play items, and a third displays a preference for abstract reasoning without needing pictorial or tangible support. The TA framework, used to deconstruct complex tasks, enables students to engage in incremental learning steps, while the 3R approach helps foster a supportive learning environment by incorporating relaxation, routine, and reinforcement of concepts. By accommodating individual learning preferences, teachers can support diverse cognitive processes and promote meaningful progress in mathematical understanding. The study calls for educators to move beyond conventional one-size-fits-all strategies, advocating for personalised and adaptive approaches that can better meet the unique needs of LD students in mathematics education.

Keywords: Concrete-pictorial-abstract (CPA), ethnographic approach, learning disabilities, mathematics education, participatory observation.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
21
Download
54
Citations
Crossref
0

References

Bruner, J. (1974). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.  

Chung, P. J., Patel, D. R., & Nizami, I. (2020). Disorder of written expression and dysgraphia: Definition, diagnosis, and management. Translational Pediatrics, 9(S1), S46-S54. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2019.11.01

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publication.  

Franzone, E. (2009, May 29). Task analysis: Steps for implementation. National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders. https://bit.ly/43zmnDL

Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370010201

Grigorenko, E. L., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Wagner, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452

Hassani, S., & Schwab, S. (2021). Social-emotional learning interventions for students with special educational needs: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 808566. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.808566

Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2020). Social-emotional profile of children with and without learning disabilities: The relationships with perceived loneliness, self-efficacy and well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), Article 7358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207358

Henry, L. A., Poloczek, S., Messer, D. J., Dennan, R., Mattiauda, E., & Danielsson, H. (2022). Hebb repetition learning in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 125, Article 104219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104219

Hui, C. S., Hoe, L. N., & Lee, K. P.  (2017). Teaching and learning with concrete-pictorial-abstract sequence – a proposed model. The Mathematics Educator, 17(1&2), 1-28. https://bit.ly/43uY0Hl

Ingkavara, T., & Yasri, P. (2019). Teaching mathematics among students with learning disability: Non-technological and technological approaches. In S. K. S. Cheung, J. Jiao, L.-K. Lee, X. Zhang, K. C. Li, & Z. Zhan (Eds.), Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations. ICTE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, (pp. 268-277). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_24

Jones, S. A., & Finch, M. (2020). A group intervention incorporating mindfulness‐informed techniques and relaxation strategies for individuals with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12337

Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (1995). Teaching children with autism: Strategies for initiating positive interactions and improving learning opportunities. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.  

Leong, Y. H., Ho, W. K., & Cheng, L. P. (2015). Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract: Surveying its origins and charting its future. The Mathematics Educator, 16(1), 1-18. https://bit.ly/4bFqgsP

Long, H., Bouck, E., & Domka, A. (2021). Manipulating algebra: Comparing concrete and virtual algebra tiles for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Exceptionality, 29(3), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1850454

Lyon, G. R. (1996). Learning disabilities. The Future of Children, 6(1), 54-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602494

Marita, S., & Hord, C. (2017). Review of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716657495

Moustafa, A. A., Al-Emadi, A. A., & Megreya, A. M. (2021). The need to develop an individualized intervention for mathematics anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 723289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723289

Novak, M., & Schwan, S. (2021). Does touching real objects affect learning? Educational Psychology Review, 33, 637-665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09551-z

Putri, H. E. (2019). Influence of concrete pictorial abstract approach to the improvement of spatial sense ability of elementary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), Article 042083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042083

Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading-related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: A review and meta-analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 70, 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00205-x

Salimi, M., Suhartono, S., Hidayah, R., & Fajari, L. E. W. (2020). Improving mathematics learning of geometry through the concrete-pictorial-abstract (CPA) approach: Collaborative action research. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663, Article 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012046

Shalev, R. S., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2001). Developmental dyscalculia. Pediatric Neurology, 24(5), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-8994(00)00258-7

Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1995). Defining and classifying learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Neurology, 10(1_suppl), S50-S57. https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738950100S111

Simms, V., Gilmore, C., Cragg, L., Clayton, S., Marlow, N., & Johnson, S. (2015). Nature and origins of mathematics difficulties in very preterm children: A different etiology than developmental dyscalculia. Pediatric Research, 77, 389-395. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.184

Stokes, J. V., Cameron, M. J., Dorsey, M. F., & Fleming, E. (2004). Task analysis, correspondence training, and general case instruction for teaching personal hygiene skills. Behavioral Interventions, 19(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.153

Swanson, H. L. (1991). Operational definitions and learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(4), 242-254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510661

Vintere, A. (2021). A study on learning difficulties related to dyscalculia and mathematical anxiety. Research for Rural Development, 36, 330-336. https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.27.2021.047

Witzel, B. S. (2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math difficulties in inclusive settings. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 49-60.  

Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, M. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(2), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00068

Yeo, J. B. W., & Choy, B. H. (2023). Fostering disciplinary thinking through mathematical inquiry. The Mathematician Educator, 4(2), 125-147. https://bit.ly/4igKtYu

...