logo logo European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education

EJMSE is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
conceptual understanding first tier test pre service teachers second tier multiple choice questionnaires

Two-tier Multiple-choice Questionnaires to Detect the Students’ Misconceptions about Heat and Temperature

Abdeljalil Métioui , Louis Trudel

This study aimed to develop a two-tiers diagnostic test to assess the high school, junior high school, and elementary pre-service teachers about the h.

T

This study aimed to develop a two-tiers diagnostic test to assess the high school, junior high school, and elementary pre-service teachers about the heat and the temperature concepts in a general physics course. There are two tiers in this test: The first tier composed of six items consisting of multiple-choice questions related to the heat and the temperature, including the correct answer. The second tier of each item contains reasons for students choosing their answer to the first tier. The second tier included four or five responses, one of which is a correct conceptual understanding. The wrong answers, also called distractors, were based on students’ misconceptions. To this end, 128 pre-service teachers from Quebec in Canada completed a pencil-paper questionnaire of sixty minutes duration composing of six questions (four open-ended questions and two multiple choice questions with justifications). As illustrations, the following  conceptual understandings have been identified in our qualitative analysis of the data collected: 1. The change of state of the matter does not require a constant temperature; 2.  The temperature is a measure in degrees to indicate the level of heat of an object or person; 3. The mercury contained in a thermometer expands when it is heated so that the particles which constitute it expand; and 4. The sensation of cold (or warm) is related to the difference in temperature.

Keywords: Conceptual understanding, first tier test, pre-service teachers, second tier multiple-choice questionnaires.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
867
Download
757
Citations
Crossref
0

References

Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and temperature among physics students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074

Anderson, A. (1980). Some aspects of children’s understanding of boiling point. In W. F. Archenhold, R. Driver, A. Orton, & C. Wood-Robinson (Eds.), Cognitive Development in Science and Mathematics: Proceedings of an international Seminar (pp. 17-21). Center for Studies in Science Education, University of Leeds.

Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280409

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90006F

Carlton, A. (2000). Teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(2), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/35/2/304

Chu, H. E., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2012). Evaluation of students’ understanding of thermal concepts in everyday contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1509-1534.  

Coppens, N., Rebmann, G., & Munier, V. (2009). Suivre l’évolution des conceptions des élèves en mécanique: développement et évaluation d’exercises informatisés [Follow the evolution of students' conceptions of mechanics: Development and evaluation of computerized exercises]. Teaching/ Didaskalia, (35), 37-58. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/31136

Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary student’s conceptions of the conduction of heat; bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20(4), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/309

Chu, H. E., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2012). Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1509‑1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.657714

Duit, R. (2006). Bibliography: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education, Kiel, Germany. Institute for Science Education. http://www.ipn.uni-iel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html

Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016

Erickson, G. (1980). Children's viewpoints of heat: A second look. Science Education, 64(3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730640307

Gregg, V. R., Winer, G. A., Cottrell, J. E., Hedman, K. E., & Fournier, J. S. (2001). The persistence of a misconception about vision after educational interventions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 622-626. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196199

Gurcay, D., & Gulbas, E. (2015). Development of three-tier heat, temperature, and internal energy diagnostic test. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 197-217.

Gurel, D. K., Eryılmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1999).Investigating a grade 11 student’s evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<55::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-P

Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502–506. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344278

Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72(5), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720506

Masson, L. (2001). Instructional practices for conceptual change in science domains. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00032-3

Métioui, A., & Trudel, L. (2020). Unipolar reasoning in electricity: Developing a digital two-tier diagnostic test. WSEAS Transactions on Electronics, 11, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.37394/232017.2020.11.11

Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207

Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-based Conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01

Rodriguez, M. C. (2016). Selected-response item development. In S. Lane, M. Raymond, & T. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of Test Development (2nd ed., pp. 259-271).Routledge.

Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 107-109.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1341254

Sözbilir, M. (2003). A review of selected literature on students’ misconceptions of heat and temperature. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 20(1), 25-41.

Shin, J., Guo, Q., & Gierl, M. J. (2019). Multiple-choice item distractor development using topic modeling approaches. Frontiers in Psychology10, 825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00825

Tiberghien, A. (2003). Des connaissances naïves au savoir scientifique [From naive knowledge to scientific knowledge]. In M. Kail (Ed.), Les sciences cognitives et l'école [Cognitive science and school] (pp. 353-413). Presses Universitaires de France (PUF).

Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(6), 626-631.

Urban, H. (2017). Sequential reasoning in electricity: Developing and using a three-tier multiple choice test. Science in Education/ Scientia in Educatione, 8(Special Issue), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.755

Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students’ understanding. The PhysicsTeacher, 39(8), 496–504.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1424603

...