logo logo European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education

EJMSE is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.


Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
boundary crossing constructivist beliefs out of field science teaching process beliefs

Teaching Science Out-of-field: Beliefs and Practices

Coral Campbell , Colleen Vale , Chris Speldewinde

Out-of-field teaching in science is a phenomenon in many secondary schools across the world. While the reasons for out-of-field teaching are complex, .


Out-of-field teaching in science is a phenomenon in many secondary schools across the world. While the reasons for out-of-field teaching are complex, its incidence is heightened in low socio-economic communities and in regional and remote school locations. Research on out-of-field science teaching in secondary schools has tended to focus on teacher competence, particularly in relation to pedagogical content knowledge. However, while teachers’ beliefs and teaching practices within their specialist subject are shown to be related, it is unclear how teachers’ beliefs and practices alter when teaching across subject boundaries. Using a boundary-crossing lens, where teachers engage in passing back and forth between different contexts, this study explored the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about their in-field and out-of-field discipline (science) and the connections to their teaching practice. Interview data, including a video-stimulated interview of a lesson in a teacher’s specialist field and then a subsequent out-of-field lesson, were analysed using the framework of a belief that investigated the relationships between in-field and out-of-field beliefs and practices. Findings indicate that those who teach science out-of-field revert to traditional ways of teaching, despite being more open and adventurous in their in-field discipline areas. However, there were significant instances of boundary crossing with their pedagogy to support their teaching – both in-field and out-of-field. These findings support the development of structured mechanisms and strategies to assist teachers to cross boundaries to establish new and unique interdisciplinary practices.

Keywords: Boundary crossing, constructivist beliefs, out-of-field science teaching, process beliefs.

cloud_download PDF
Article Metrics


Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n37.2012

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132-169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435

Anderson, D. (2015). The nature and influence of teacher beliefs and knowledge on the science teaching practice of three generalist New Zealand primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 45, 395-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9428-8

Bakker, A., & Akkerman, S. F. (2014). A boundary-crossing approach to support students’ integration of statistical and work-related knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9517-z

Beswick, K. (2007). Teachers’ beliefs that matter in secondary classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9035-3

Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematician’s mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9333-2

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 21(6), 624-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325

Constantinou, C., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.). Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning (pp. 1-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0_1

Dixon, M., Ferguson, P., Hay, T., Moss, J., & White, J. (2004). Moving your story forward: Frameworks for thinking about learning and teaching. In M. Dixon, R. English, P. Ferguson, S. Godhino, T. Hay, L., Longaretti, J. Moss, F. Sandjakdar, J. White, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Invitations and inspirations (pp. 12-30). Curriculum Corporation.

Donitsa-Schmidt, S., Zuzovsky, R., & Elyashiv, R. A. (2022). First-year out-of-field teachers: Support mechanisms, satisfaction and retention. In L. Hobbs & R. Porsch (Eds.), Out-of-field teaching across teaching disciplines and contexts (pp. 175-190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9328-1_9

du Plessis, A. (2019). Water as an inescapable risk: Current global water availability, quality and risks with a specific focus on South Africa.  Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03186-2

du Plessis, A. E. (2015). Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.005

Hancock, E. S., & Gallard, A. J. (2017). Preservice Science Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching and Learning: The Influence of K-12 Field Experiences, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048331.17407.f5  

Handal, B., Watson, K., Petocz, P., & Maher, M. (2013). Retaining mathematics and science teachers in rural and remote schools, Australian and International Journal of Rural Education 23(3) 13-27. https://doi.org/10.47381/aijre.v23i3.667

Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching 'out-of-field' as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11, 271-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9333-4

Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Delaney, S., Speldewinde, C., & Lai, J. (2020). Defining and mapping out-of-field teaching in Victorian Government schools. Deakin University.  

Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Delaney, S., Speldewinde, C., & Lai, J. (2022). Defining teaching out-of-field: An imperative for research, policy and practice. In L. Hobbs & R. Porsch (Eds.), Out-of-field teaching across teaching disciplines and contexts (pp. 23-48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9328-1_2

Hobbs, L., du Plessis, A. E., Quinn, F., & Rochette, E. (2019). Examining the complexity of the out-of-field teacher experience through multiple theoretical lenses. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field” (pp. 87-128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_4  

Hobbs, L., & Quinn, F. (2020). Out-of-field teachers as learners: Influences on teacher perceived capacity and enjoyment over time. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 627-651.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1806230

Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2017). Science teachers’ conceptualizations and implications for the development of the professional development programs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3301-3314. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00718a

Kola, A. J., & Sunday, O. S. (2015). A review of teacher self-efficacy, pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and out-of-field teaching: Focussing on Nigerian teachers. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150403.15

Long, F., Hall, K., Conway, P., & Murphy, R. (2012). Novice teachers as ‘invisible’ learners. Teachers and Teaching, 18(6), 619-636. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.746498

Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Teacher Education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301-1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187009

Luft, J. A., Navy, S. L., Wong, S. S., & Hill, K. M. (2022). The first 5 years of teaching science: The beliefs, knowledge, practices, and opportunities to learn of secondary science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(9), 1692-1725. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21771

Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and Mathematics Education in Rural and Regional Australia- The SiMERR National Survey: Abridged Report of Findings. SiMERR. https://bit.ly/3oZaXri

Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230-1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.743196

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS.  https://bit.ly/3CwyG4Z

Myhill, D., & Warren, P. (2005). Scaffolds or straitjackets? Critical moments in classroom discourse. Educational Review, 57(1), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191042000274187

Ní Ríordáin, M., & Hannigan, A. (2009). Out-of-field teaching in post-primary mathematics education: An analysis of the Irish context. National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning. https://bit.ly/3X0Zcgv

Ní Ríordáin, M., Paolucci, C., & Lyons, T. (2019). Teacher professional competence: What can be learned about the knowledge and practices needed for teaching. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field” (pp. 129-150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_5  

Nixon, R. S., Luft, J. A., & Ross, R. J. (2017). Prevalence and predictors of out-of-field teaching in the first five years. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9),1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21402

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First Results from TALIS. https://bit.ly/3MYIV71

Price, A., Vale, C., Porsch, R., Rayahu, E., Faulkneer, F., Ni Riordain, M., Crisan, C., & Luft, J. (2019). Teaching out-of-field internationally. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field” (pp. 53-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_3  

Productivity Commission. (2017). Shifting the Dial: 5 year productivity review (Inquiry report no. 84). https://bit.ly/43VXWxz 

Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage.

Rochette, E. (2022). Understanding the complexity of science teachers’ lived experience as they navigate two out-of-field areas: Implications and possibilities. In L. Hobbs & R. Porsch (Eds.), Out-of-field teaching across teaching disciplines and contexts (pp. 99-116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9328-1_5

Schulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Törner, G., & Törner, A. (2012). Underqualified math teachers or out-of-field teaching in Mathematics: A neglectable field of action? In W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferro & K. Maaß (Eds.), Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität [Mathematics teaching in the context of reality, culture and teacher professionalism] (pp. 196–206). Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-2389-2_21

Tsai, C.-C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049132

Vale, C., Campbell, C., Speldewinde, C., & White, P. (2020). Teaching across subject boundaries in STEM: Continuities in beliefs about learning and teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 463-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09983-2

Vale, C., Campbell, C., & White, P. (2021). Beliefs and practices of secondary teachers crossing subject boundaries to teach mathematics out-of-field. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00323-0

Vale, C., & Drake, P. (2019). Attending to out-of-field teaching: implications of and for education policy. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.). Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field”: International perspectives on teaching as a non-specialist (pp. 195-215). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_8 

Weldon, P. R. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in secondary schools (Policy Insights- 6). Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/policyinsights/6/

Williams, J., & Berry, A. (2016). Boundary crossing and the professional learning of teacher educators in new international contexts. Studying Teacher Education, 12(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2016.1192031

Williams, J., & Roth, W.-M. (2019). Theoretical perspectives on interdisciplinary mathematics education. In B. Doig, J. Williams, D. Swanson, R. Borromeo Ferri & P. Drake (Eds.), Interdisciplinary mathematics education: The state of the art and beyond: ICME-13 Series (pp. 13-34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6_3

Wong, S. S., & Luft, J. A. (2015). Secondary science teachers’ beliefs and persistence: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(7), 619-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9441-4

Xu, L., Fang, S.-C., & Hobbs, L. (2023). The relevance of STEM: A case study of an Australian secondary school as an arena of STEM curriculum innovation and enactment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10267-5