Using the Aptitude Treatment Interaction Model Integrated Character Values to Improve Mathematical Story Problem Solving Skills for Fifth-Grade Students
This study aims to describe the implication of the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) model integrated with character values to increase the student.
- Pub. date: September 15, 2023
- Pages: 191-200
- 216 Downloads
- 292 Views
- 0 Citations
This study aims to describe the implication of the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) model integrated with character values to increase the students’ skill in solving mathematics story problems. This study applied a quasi-experimental research type using a non-equivalent control group design involving two classes with 30 students each. Data was collected using a test instrument for solving mathematics story problem. Data were analyzed using n-gain descriptive statistical analysis to see the increase in students' skill in solving mathematics story world problems. The results showed that the average score of student's aptitude in solving mathematics story problems is 91.26 which is in the category of very high. There is an increase in the students’ ability with score of an n-gain of 0.77 which is in the category of high. In addition, the results of observations related to the implementation of learning model of the ATI with a percentage of 87.5% in the category of very good. Thus, the character-based ATI learning model can be used to increase the students’ skill in solving mathematics story problem. In addition, it accommodates the character of students who are concerned with learning mathematics so that learning goals can be achieved both from cognitive and attitudinal aspects.
Keywords: Aptitude treatment interaction, characters, mathematics story problems.
0
References
Abdullah, A., & ZA, T. (2018). Orientation of education in shaping the intellectual intelligence of children. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8200-8204. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12523
Abdullah, I., Hudayana, B., Setiadi, Kutanegara, P. M., & Indiyanto, A. (2019). Beyond school reach: Character education in three schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(3), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2019-0032
Afandi, Sajidan, Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21st-century skills standards for prospective science teachers: A Delphi Study. Indonesian Journal of Science Education/Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647
Askhamov, A. A., Konysheva, A. V., & Gapsalamov, A. R. (2016). Use of E-resources of the learning environment in teaching mathematics to future engineers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(5), 673-684. https://bit.ly/3KZpNFU
Azid, N., Hasan, R., Nazarudin, N. F. M., & Md-Ali, R. (2020). Embracing industrial revolution 4.0: The effect of using web 2.0 tools on primary schools students' mathematics achievement (fraction). International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 711-728. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13348a
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Permendiknas RI No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah [RI Minister of national education no. 22 of 2006 concerning content standards for elementary and middle education units]. BSNP.
Baehr, J. (2017). The varieties of character and some implications for character education. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46, 1153-1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0654-z
Begum, A., Liu, J., Qayum, H., & Mamdouh, A. (2022). Environmental and moral education for effective environmentalism: An ideological and philosophical approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), Article 15549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315549
Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48, 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
Dewia, E. R., & Alam, A. A. (2020). Transformation model for character education of students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1228-1237. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5155
Fatimah, M., Sutama, & Aly, A. (2020). Religious culture development in community school: A case study of Boyolali middle school, central Java, Indonesia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 381-388. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8243
Giacalone, R. A., & Promislo, M. D. (2012). Broken when entering: The stigmatization of goodness and business ethics education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(1), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0005a
Hanum, O., Johar, R., & Yusrizal. (2021). Students’ thinking process in solving higher-order thinking (HOT) problems through aptitude treatment interaction (ATI) learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882, Article 012086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012086
Hawkins, R. O., Collins, T., Hernan, C., & Flowers, E. (2017). Using computer-assisted instruction to build math fact fluency: An implementation guide. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(3), 141-147 https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216644827
Herayanti, L., Widodo, W., Susantini, E., & Gunawan, G. (2020). The effectiveness of the blended learning model based on inquiry collaborative tutorial toward students’ problem-solving skills in physics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 959-972. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.675819
Horn, I. S., & Kane, B. D. (2015). Opportunities for professional learning in mathematics teacher workgroup conversations: Relationships to instructional expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 373-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1034865
Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between science process skills and scientific attitudes of students towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.600979
Kardoyo, Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-based learning strategy: Its impact on students' critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1141-1150. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1141
Kaur, S. (2015). Moral values in education. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(3), 21-26. https://bit.ly/3QZe9Ph
Kim, K., Harris, C. J., & Pham, L. (2018). How Character Education Impacts Teachers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 3(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.32674/jimphe.v3i1.632
Klimecká, E. (2020). Labelling of gifted children in the family from the perspective of teachers and its manifestations at school. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Pedagogika, 71(137), 196-212. https://bit.ly/3OX9YR7
Martin, C. K., Nacu, D., & Pinkard, N. (2016). Revealing opportunities for 21st century learning: An approach to interpreting user trace log data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 37-87. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.4
Matsuda, N., Weng, W., & Wall, N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive scaffolding for learning by teaching a teachable agent. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00190-2
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. https://bit.ly/3IoOudv
Paolini, A. C. (2020). Social emotional learning: Key to career readiness. Anatolian Journal of Education, 5(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2020.5112a
Pradana, D. A., Mahfud, M., Hermawan, C., & Susanti, H. D. (2020). Nationalism: Character education orientation in learning development. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 3(4), 4026-4034. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i4.1501
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian hasil belajar pada tingkat satuan pendidikan [Assessment of learning outcomes at the level of educational units]. Unesa University Press.
Satianingsih, R., Budiyono, S. C., & Subandowo, M. (2020). Character education in multicultural society: Case in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(4), 337-344. https://bit.ly/47UcKiY
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Sciurba, K. (2020). Depicting Hate: Picture books and the realities of white supremacist crime and violence. Teachers College Record, 122(8), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200813
Septiana, E., Zubainur, C. M., & Ramli, M. (2021, May). The enhancement of student’s mathematical understanding ability through the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882, Article 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012072
Steinweg, A. S., Akinwunmi, K., & Lenz, D. (2018). Making implicit algebraic thinking explicit: Exploiting national characteristics of German approaches. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds: The global evolution of an emerging field of research and practice (pp. 283-307). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_12
Steyn, G. M., & Van Tonder, S. (2017). Exploring learning experiences of female adults in higher education using a hybrid study approach: A case study. Gender and Behaviour, 15(1), 8135-8159. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-88008dc08
Syamsuddin, A., Babo, R., Sulfasyah, Bakri, H., & Jainuddin (2022). An investigation of students’ mathematical concept understanding and motivation through the implementation of aptitude treatment interaction learning model. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(4), 891-902. https://bit.ly/45ryHUJ
Tang, R., & Braver, T. S. (2020). Towards an individual differences perspective in mindfulness training research: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 0818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00818
Taranto, E. (2020). MOOCs for mathematics teacher education: New environments for professional development. In Teaching and learning mathematics online (pp. 359-384). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351245586-22
Tetzlaff, L., Schmiedek, F., & Brod, G. (2021). Developing personalized education: A dynamic framework. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 863-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09570-w
Van Schoors, R., Elen, J., Raes, A., & Depaepe, F. (2021). An overview of 25 years of research on digital personalised learning in primary and secondary education: A systematic review of conceptual and methodological trends. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1798-1822. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13148
Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, pedagogy and education, 26(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730
Xu, T., & Zhang, B. (2021). Improving thinking skills in early childhood using effective teaching strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, Article 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101704