The Influence of Teacher Clarity and Real-World Applications on Students’ Achievement in Modern Algebra
This study tested hypotheses of a hypothetical model determining the influence of teacher clarity and real-world applications while teaching group the.
- Pub. date: June 15, 2023
- Pages: 111-119
- 206 Downloads
- 379 Views
- 0 Citations
This study tested hypotheses of a hypothetical model determining the influence of teacher clarity and real-world applications while teaching group theory concepts on students’ achievement in modern algebra. The data collected from 139 undergraduate students were analyzed by regression analysis using Stata14’s structural equation model building and estimation. The path regression analysis of the model using SEM model building and estimation confirmed the research hypotheses. First, the utilization of real-world application problems while teaching group theory concepts has a significant influence on students’ achievement in modern algebra. Second, the clear presentation of group theory concepts by the teacher has a significant influence on students’ achievement in modern algebra. Finally, both teachers’ clear presentation of group theory concepts and utilization of its real-world applications have a significant influence on students’ achievement in modern algebra.
Keywords: Achievement, modern algebra, real-world applications, teacher clarity.
0
References
Alexander, L., Frankiewicz, R. G., & Williams, R. E. (1979). Facilitation of learning and retention of oral instruction using advance and post organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), 701-707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.5.701
Arends, F. (2021). Help them understand: The importance of instructional clarity in teaching and learning. Human Science Research Council Reviews, 19(2), 33–34. https://ln.run/kipMS
Blaich, C., Wise, K., Pascarella, E. T., & Roksa, J. (2016). Instructional clarity and organization: It’s not new or fancy, but it matters. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1198142
Blum, W. H.-J., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45–58. https://ln.run/9N39V
Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Kelsey, D. M. (2016). Instructor clarity and student motivation: Academic performance as a product of students' ability and motivation to process instructional material. Communication Education, 65(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329
Brewer, E. W., & Burgess, D. N. (2005). Professor's role in motivating students to attend class. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 42(3), 23-47. https://bit.ly/43AekDq
Butler, M. G., Church, K. S., & Spencer, A. W. (2019). Do, reflect, think, apply: Experiential education in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 48, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2019.05.001
Chesebro, J. L. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302471
Civikly, J. M. (1992). Clarity: Teachers and students making sense of instruction. Communication Education, 41(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529209378876
Cooper, B., & Harries, T. (2005). Making sense of realistic word problems: Portraying working class “failure” in a division with remainder problem. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500256228
Cruickshank, D. R., & Kennedy, J. J. (1986). Teacher clarity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(1), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(86)90004-1
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
Damlamian, A., Rodrigues, J. F., & Sträßer, R. (Eds.). (2013). Educational interfaces between mathematics and industry: Report on an ICMI-ICIAM-study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02270-3
Evans, W. E., & Guymon, R. E. (1978). Clarity of explanation: A powerful indicator of teacher effectiveness (ED 151321). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED151321
Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.173
Frejd, P. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions of mathematical modelling at Swedish upper secondary school. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(5), 17–40. diva2:608159
Good, T. L., & Grouws, D. A. (1977). Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth-grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717702800310
Hiller, J. H., Fisher, G. A., & Kaess, W. (1969). A computer investigation of verbal characteristics of effective classroom learning. American Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 661-675. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312006004661
Hines, C. V., Cruickshank, D. R., & Kennedy, J. J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement and satisfaction. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022001087
Imlawi, J., Gregg, D., & Karimi, J. (2015). Student engagement in course-based social networks: The impact of instructor credibility and use of communication. Computers and Education, 88, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.015
Land, M. L. (1979). Low-inference variables and teacher clarity: Effects on student concept learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(6), 795-799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.6.795
Land, M. L., & Smith, L. R. (1979). The effect of low-inference teacher clarity inhibitors on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3), 55-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717903000322
Lee, M. Y., & Lim, W. (2017). Investigating preservice teachers’ written feedback on procedure-based mathematics assessment items. In B. Kaur, W. K., Ho, T.L., Toh & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 137–144). PME.
Li, T. (2013). Mathematical modelling education is the most important educational interface between mathematics and industry. In A. Damlamian, J. F. Rodrigues, & R. Sträßer (Eds.), Educational interfaces between mathematics and industry (pp. 51–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02270-3_5
Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The benefits of good teaching extend beyond course achievement. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i2.13167
Maaß, J., O’Meara, N., O’Donoghue, J., & Johnson, P. (2018). Mathematical modelling for teachers: A practical guide to applicable mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00431-6
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
Osher, D., & Kendziora, K. (2010). Building conditions for learning and healthy adolescent development: Strategic approaches. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl & J. Koon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 121-140). Routledge.
Pais, A. (2013). An ideology critique of the use-value of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9484-4
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809532
Roksa, J., Trolian, T. L., Blaich, C., & Wise, K. (2017). Facilitating academic performance in college: Understanding the role of clear and organized instruction. Higher Education, 74, 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0048-2
Rosenshine, B. V. (1987). Explicit teaching and teacher training. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 75-92). Random House. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800308
Sevinc, S., & Lesh, R. (2018). Training mathematics teachers for realistic math problems: A case of modelling based teacher education courses. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 50, 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0898-9
Shin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2020). Examining the hard, peer, and teacher scaffolding framework in inquiry-based technology-enhancing learning environments: Impact on academic achievement and group performance. Education Technology Research and Development, 68, 2423-2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09763-8
Simonds, C. J. (1997). Classroom understanding: An expanded notion of teacher clarity. Communication Research Reports, 14(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388671
Smith, L. R. (1977). Aspects of teacher discourse and student achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.2307/748520
Smith, L. R., & Edmonds, E. M. (1978). Teacher vagueness and pupil participation in mathematics learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(3), 228-232. https://doi.org/10.2307/749000
Stone, J. R., III, & Lewis, M. V. (2012). College and career ready in the 21st century: Making high school matter. Teachers College Press.
Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907
Titsworth, S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analysis exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 64(4), 385-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
Weinberger, C. J. (2004). Just ask! Why surveyed women did not pursue IT courses or careers. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23(2), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTAS.2004.1304399
Wheeless, V. E., Witt, P. L., Maresh, M., Bryand, M. C., & Schrodt, P. (2011). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructor communication and students’ intent to persist in college. Communication Education, 60(3), 314–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2011.555917
Wilson, F. (2003). Can compute, won’t compute: Women’s participation in the culture of computing. New Technology, Work, and Employment, 18(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00115
Yagan, S. A. (2021). The relationships between instructional clarity, classroom management and mathematics achievement: Mediator role of attitudes towards mathematics. In W. B. James, C. Cobanoglu, & M. Cavusoglu (Eds.), Advances in global education and research (Vol. 4, pp. 1-11). USF M3 Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5038/9781955833042