Investigating ‘A’ Level Biology Teachers’ Content Knowledge on Biodiversity in Midlands Urban: A Case of Four Selected Teachers
This paper reports on part of an ongoing large-scale research on the need to improve science teaching and learning through investigating the Pedagogic.
- Pub. date: March 15, 2023
- Pages: 49-63
- 161 Downloads
- 300 Views
- 0 Citations
This paper reports on part of an ongoing large-scale research on the need to improve science teaching and learning through investigating the Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of biology teachers for the topic Biodiversity. Six factors have been seen to affect teacher PCK, i.e., content knowledge, knowledge of students, science teaching orientations, knowledge of assessment, knowledge of instructional strategies and knowledge of the curriculum. This research aimed to examine the teacher’s level of content knowledge (CK). A qualitative research paradigm was adopted, and a case study research design used. The case (unit of analysis) was Biology teacher CK, and the subjects were the four teacher participants purposively selected. Lesson observations, teacher interviews and learner questionnaires were used to collect data on teacher CK. A content knowledge analytical framework consisting of five constructs was designed and used to analyse the teacher CK and data triangulated with data collected from interviews and questionnaires. This research revealed that ‘A’ level Biology teachers’ CK vary from teacher to teacher depending on several factors which include teacher identity, planning, workshopping, and motivation among others. Of the four Biology teacher participants, two had adequate CK and the other two exhibited inadequate CK. Inadequate CK was attributed to lack of planning, non-exposure to workshops and lack of teacher motivation. Consequently, this research recommends supervision of teachers from school level to national level, a series of teacher workshops on the demands of the competence-based curriculum and constructive teacher identity as well as introduce factors that enhance teacher motivation. Further research on the content knowledge of Biology teachers in other learning areas is recommended.
Keywords: Biodiversity, Content knowledge, competence-based curriculum, teacher identity.
0
References
Alshehry, A. T. (2014). Investigating factors affecting science teachers' performance and satisfaction toward their teaching process at Najran University for girls' science colleges. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 73-82. Https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p73
Antwi, V., Anderson, I. K., & Abagali, O. K. (2016). Effect of in-service training on science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and content knowledge competencies in basic electronics in the Ghanaian Junior High school context. European Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(6), 1-15. https://bit.ly/40mwdEt
Azad, M., & Kalam, A. (2013). Grammar teaching in EFL classrooms: Teachers' attitudes and beliefs. ASA University Review, 7(2), 111-126.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Carpendale, J., & Hume, A. (2019). Investigating practising science teachers’ pPCK and ePCK development as a result of collaborative CoRe design. In A. Hume, R. Cooper & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 225-252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_10
Catalano, A., Asselta, L., & Durkin, A. (2019). Exploring the relationship between science content knowledge and science teaching self-efficacy among elementary teachers. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.1.04
Chang, S. H., Ward, P., & Goodway, J. D. (2020). The effect of a content knowledge teacher professional workshop on enacted pedagogical content knowledge and student learning in a throwing unit. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(5), 493-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1743252
Childs, A., & McNicholl, J. (2007). investigating the relationship between subject content knowledge and pedagogical practice through the analysis of classroom discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 29(13), 1629-1653, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601180817
Chopoo, S., Thathong, K., & Halim, L. (2014). Biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in Thailand: Understanding and Practice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 116, 442-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.237
Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers' concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049271.01649.dd
Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1-12. http://bit.ly/3YUvKrZ
Garnett, P. J., & Tobin, K. (1988). Teaching for understanding: Exemplary practice in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260102
Guerriero, S. (2014). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession: Background report and project objectives. OECD. https://bit.ly/3YNnVnM
Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030462
Izadinia, M. (2013). A review of research on student teachers' professional identity. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 694-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2012.679614
Kind, V. (2014). A degree is not enough: A quantitative study of aspects of pre-service science teachers’ chemistry content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1313-1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.860497
Koberstein-Schwarz, M., & Meisert, A. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge in material-based lesson planning of preservice biology teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 116, Article 103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103745
Miller, J. (2009). Teacher identity. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 172-181). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139042710.023
Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2016). Curriculum framework for primary and secondary education 2015-2022. https://cutt.ly/R4izX2o
Mullins, K. (2016). IDEA model from theory to practice: integrating information literacy in academic courses. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.10.008
Niemelä, M. A., & Tirri, K. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge of curriculum integration: A current challenge for Finnish subject teachers. Contemporary pedagogies in teacher education and development, 119-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75870
Nind, M. (2020). A new application for the concept of pedagogical content knowledge: teaching advanced social science research methods. Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1644996
Ní Shuilleabhain, A. (2015). Developing mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through iterative cycles of lesson study. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 9) (pp. 2734-2740). Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME). http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7789
Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43, 1135-1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9303-4
Özden, M. (2008). The effect of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching phases of matters. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 633-645.
Phaeton, M. J., & Stears, M. (2016). Exploring the alignment of the intended and implemented curriculum through teachers’ interpretation: A case study of A-level biology practical work. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00640a
Reed, M., & Michaud, C. (2010). Goal-driven lesson planning for teaching English to speakers of other languages. University of Michigan Press ELT. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.1425013
Roth, K. J., Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Curriculum materials, teacher talk and student learning: Case studies in fifth grade science teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(6), 527-548 https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190605
Rusznyak, L., & Walton, E. (2011). Lesson planning guidelines for student teachers: A scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Education as Change, 15(2), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.619141
Santau, A. O., Maerten-Rivera, J. L., Bovis, S., & Orend, J. (2014). A mile wide or an inch deep? Improving elementary preservice teachers’ science content knowledge within the context of a science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 953-976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9402-3
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/gc8qnc
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary science teacher? Journal of Research in Science teaching, 27(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270103
van Driel, J. (2021). Science teachers’ knowledge development. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004505452
Yuenyong, C., & Thao-Do, T. P. (2020). Developing a tool to assess students’ views of nature of science in Vietnam. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.22043